What is another word for draws attention?

Pronunciation: [dɹˈɔːz ɐtˈɛnʃən] (IPA)

When it comes to describing how something catches the eye or grabs one's focus, there are many synonyms for the phrase "draws attention." Some options include "captivates," "compels," "enthralls," "intrigues," "charms," and "fascinates." Other phrases that convey the same idea include "commands notice," "grabs the eye," "catches one's gaze," "attracts interest," and "demands awareness." All of these synonyms imply that something is able to captivate an audience and hold their attention, making it an important aspect of writing, marketing, and any other form of communication that depends on capturing people's interest to be effective.

What are the hypernyms for Draws attention?

A hypernym is a word with a broad meaning that encompasses more specific words called hyponyms.

What are the opposite words for draws attention?

The word "draws attention" can have several antonyms that convey the opposite meaning. Some of these antonyms include discourages, detours, ignores, distracts, and repels. When something discourages or detours attention, it means that it diverts attention away from what is being presented. To ignore something means to not pay attention to it at all. Something that distracts takes attention away from something else, while something that repels drives attention away. These antonyms can be useful when trying to create different emotional responses in written content, such as a story or a speech. Choosing the right antonym can help create a more impactful message.

What are the antonyms for Draws attention?

Famous quotes with Draws attention

  • Anyone who draws attention to himself as an individual, is viewed with suspicion. We acquired this tendency, of course, from America, and we must resist it: levelling, and imitation of what others are already doing.
    Dietrich Fischer-Dieskau
  • If the young are watched too closely, if they are kept habitually under surveillance, the spring of action is weakened, the power of initiative is destroyed, and they become mediocre, commonplace, mechanical men and women, from whom nothing excellent or distinguished may be expected. Parents and teachers … must so deal with the young as to bring them little by little under the control of reason and conscience; and in this, nothing thwarts more surely than excessive supervision, for it draws attention from the inner view and voice to the eyes of the watchers. It may cultivate a love of decency and propriety, but not the creative feeling that we live with God and that righteousness is life.
    John Lancaster Spalding
  • If one thinks that ideological conceptions are an important feature of modern societies, and that the analysis of ideologies will therefore have to be an integral component of any contemporary political philosophy, Rawls’s view is seriously deficient, because it does not thematise power. The idea that seems to be presupposed by the doctrine of the veil of ignorance—namely, that one can in some way get a better grasp or understanding of the power relations in society and how they work by covering them up, ignoring them, or simply wishing them away—seems very naïve. To the extent, then, to which Rawls draws attention away from the phenomenon of power and the way in which it influences our lives and the way we see the world, his theory is itself ideological. To think that an appropriate point of departure for understanding the political world is our intuitions of what is “just,” without reflecting on where those intuitions come from, how they are maintained, and what interests they might serve, seems to exclude from the beginning the very possibility that these intuitions might themselves be “ideological.”
    Raymond Geuss
  • Once a scientific question is settled, it remains interesting and alive only if it draws attention to new questions; every conclusion is meant as a transition to a new beginning.
    Adrienne von Speyr
  • What is going on here is a deliberate revision by Current not only of Lincoln but of himself in order to serve the saint in the 1980s as opposed to the saint at earlier times when black were still colored, having only just stopped being Negroes. In colored and Negro days the saint might have wanted them out of the country, as he did. But in the age of Martin Luther King even the most covertly racist of school boards must agree that a saint like Abraham Lincoln could never have wanted a single black person to leave freedom’s land much less bravery’s home. So all the hagiographers are redoing their plaster images and anyone who draws attention to the discrepancy between their own past crudities and their current falsities is a very bad person indeed, and not a scholar, and probably a communist as well.
    Gore Vidal

Word of the Day

non-evolutionary
The antonyms for the word "non-evolutionary" are "evolutionary," "progressive," and "adaptive." These words indicate a trend towards change, growth, and development - quite the opp...