What is another word for drive home?

Pronunciation: [dɹˈa͡ɪv hˈə͡ʊm] (IPA)

Drive home is a common phrase that means to emphasize or make someone understand something clearly. There are many synonyms for this phrase that can be used, such as stress, underscore, highlight, reiterate, reinforce, emphasize, and impress. These words all convey the same meaning as drive home and can be used interchangeably in most contexts. When you want to make a point or highlight the importance of something, you can use any of these words to express yourself. No matter which word you choose, the goal is to make your message clear and ensure that the person you are speaking to understands the significance of what you are saying.

Synonyms for Drive home:

What are the hypernyms for Drive home?

A hypernym is a word with a broad meaning that encompasses more specific words called hyponyms.
  • hypernyms for drive home (as verbs)

What are the hyponyms for Drive home?

Hyponyms are more specific words categorized under a broader term, known as a hypernym.
  • hyponyms for drive home (as verbs)

What are the opposite words for drive home?

The phrase "drive home" is often used to describe the act of emphasizing or reinforcing a point or idea. However, there are several antonyms that can be used to convey the opposite meaning. Instead of "driving home" a point, one could "brush over" or "skim" a topic, suggesting a lack of emphasis or importance placed on the subject. Another antonym could be to "undermine" or "downplay" the significance of the topic at hand. Similarly, one could "dilute" or "weaken" the point being made, suggesting a lack of conviction or clarity. These antonyms can be used to express a range of tones and attitudes in communication.

What are the antonyms for Drive home?

Famous quotes with Drive home

  • The show doesn't drive home a lesson, but it can open up people's minds enough for them to see how stupid every kind of prejudice can be.
    Redd Foxx
  • Under Milton Friedman’s influence, the free-market ideology shifted toward unmitigated laissez-faire. Whereas earlier advocates had worried about the stringent conditions that were needed for unregulated markets to work their magic, Friedman was the master of clever (sometimes too clever) arguments to the effect that those conditions were not really needed, or that they were actually met in real-world markets despite what looked a lot like evidence to the contrary. He was a natural-born debater: single-minded, earnestly persuasive, ingenious, and relentless. My late friend and colleague Paul Samuelson, who was often cast as Friedman’s opponent in such jousts, written and oral, once remarked that he often felt that he had won every argument and lost the debate. As for relentlessness: Professor Friedman came to my department to give a talk to graduate students in economics. The custom was that, after the seminar, the speaker and a small group of students would have dinner together, and continue discussion. On one such occasion I went along for the dinner. The conversation was lively and predictable. I had a long drive home, so at about ten o’clock I excused myself and left. Next morning I saw one of the students and asked how the rest of the dinner had gone. “Well,” he replied, “Professor Friedman kept arguing and arguing, and after a while I heard myself agreeing to things I knew weren’t true.” I suspect that was not the only such occasion.
    Milton Friedman

Word of the Day

multitasker
The word "multitasker" usually refers to someone who can perform different tasks simultaneously. However, there are several antonyms for this word, which describe the opposite type...