What are the opposite words for grow larger?

The antonyms for the phrase "grow larger" include reduce, shrink, decrease, diminish, dwindle, and contract. These terms denote the opposite of growth and refer to the process of something becoming smaller in size or quantity. While growing larger suggests development and expansion, its antonyms suggest a decline in size or quantity. For example, if a plant is growing larger, it is getting bigger, whereas if it is shrinking, it is getting smaller. Similarly, if a company is growing larger, it is expanding, whereas if it is contracting, it is downsizing. Understanding antonyms helps enrich vocabulary, and it allows for better communication by providing more precise and diverse ways to express oneself.

What are the antonyms for Grow larger?

• v.

  • enlarge
  • abbreviate
  ,
  • abridge
  ,
  • compress
  ,
  • condense
  ,
  • constrict
  ,
  • contract
  ,
  • curtail
  ,
  • cut
  ,
  • decline
  ,
  • decrease
  ,
  • diminish
  ,
  • drop
  ,
  • fall
  ,
  • halt
  ,
  • lessen
  ,
  • lower
  ,
  • narrow
  ,
  • reduce
  ,
  • restrict
  ,
  • shorten
  ,
  • shrink
  ,
  • simplify
  ,
  • slump
  ,
  • stop
  .
  • swell
  • concentrate
  ,
  • lose
  .
  • widen
  • block
  ,
  • close
  ,
  • conceal
  ,
  • cramp
  ,
  • hide
  .

• Other relevant words:

• fail
.

Famous quotes with Grow larger

• The land is not in the least bit fertile and yet the cattle herds grow larger and larger. A cow represents capital investment here.

  Richard Leakey
• By the term individual I shall mean that in which each of us is peculiarly himself. I shall emphasize not what is common is us, but what is uncommon, and this leads me to a restatement of our question. In considering what is happening to the individual, I shall discuss what in modern civilization is happening to the in us. Are we becoming more common or more uncommon? Are the common people destroying the uncommon? Is the public self of us crushing out the personal self? Are we being directed more from without than from within? As our group memberships grow larger, do we as persons tend to grow smaller? Do the tendencies of the present day, mass movements, social organization, publicity, public education, emphasize the unique in man, or enhance the dominance of undifferentiated man acting as mass?

  Everett Dean Martin
• The number of syllables in the English names of finite integers tends to increase as the integers grow larger, and must gradually increase indefinitely, since only a finite number of names can be made with a given finite number of syllables. Hence the names of some integers must consist of at least nineteen syllables, and among these there must be a least. Hence "the least integer not nameable in fewer than nineteen syllables" must denote a definite integer; in fact, it denotes 111, 777. But "the least integer not nameable in fewer than nineteen syllables" is itself a name consisting of eighteen syllables; hence the least integer not nameable in fewer than nineteen syllables can be named in eighteen syllables, which is a contradiction. This contradiction was suggested to us by Mr. G. G. Berry of the Bodleian Library.

  Bertrand Russell
• Back at the Philadelphia Worldcon (which seems a million years ago), I announced the famous five-year gap: I was going to skip five years forward in the story, to allow some of the younger characters to grow older and the dragons to grow larger, and for various other reasons. I started out writing on that basis in 2001, and it worked very well for some of my myriad characters but not at all for others, because you can't just have nothing happen for five years. If things do happen you have to write flashbacks, a lot of internal retrospection, and that's not a good way to present it. I struggled with that essentially wrong direction for about a year before finally throwing it out, realizing there had to be another interim book. That became , where the action is pretty much continuous from the preceding book. Even so, that only accounts for one year. Why the four after that? I don't know, except that this was a very tough book to write -- and it remains so, because I've only finished half. Going in, I thought I could do something about the length of the second book in the series, , roughly 1,200 pages in manuscript. But I passed that and there was a lot more to write. Then I passed the length of the third book, , which was something like 1,500 pages in manuscript and gave my publishers all around the world lots of production problems. I didn't really want to make any cuts because I had this huge story to tell. We started thinking about dividing it in two and doing it as , Parts One and Two, but the more I thought about that the more I really did not like it. Part One would have had no resolution whatsoever for 18 viewpoint characters and their 18 stories. Of course this is all part of a huge megaseries so there is not a complete resolution yet in any of the volumes, but I try to give a certain sense of completion at the end of each volume -- that a movement of the symphony has wrapped up, so to speak.

  George R. R. Martin

The antonyms for the term "Middle Class Populations" are "extreme poverty populations" and "wealthy high-class populations." Extreme poverty populations refer to people who suffer ...