What is another word for halfwit?

Pronunciation: [hˈɑːfwɪt] (IPA)

There are several synonyms for the word "halfwit". Some of the common ones include "idiot", which is used to describe someone who lacks intelligence or common sense, and "fool", which is used to describe someone who is foolish or naive. Another common synonym is "simpleton", which describes someone who is simple-minded or lacks intelligence. "Moron" is another synonym used to describe someone who is extremely foolish. "Dimwit" and "nincompoop" also describe someone who is lacking in intelligence and common sense. Overall, these synonyms all refer to someone who has a significant lack of intelligence or poor judgment.

Synonyms for Halfwit:

What are the hypernyms for Halfwit?

A hypernym is a word with a broad meaning that encompasses more specific words called hyponyms.

What are the opposite words for halfwit?

Halfwit or a person with moderate intelligence can be referred to negatively in conversation or writing as having antonyms such as clever, intelligent, bright, sharp-witted, quick-witted, smart, astute, or brainy. These terms point towards an individual's sharpness, superior mental ability, and thinking capacity. Conversely, the antonyms for halfwit put emphasis on a person's high cognitive skills, clarity of thinking, and overall sophisticated intellect. They are an expressive replacement that implies the quality of sound reviewing, intellectual principles, a shrewd measurement of the circumstance. In discussions and debates, antonyms for halfwit could be an effective way for conveyance when seeking to demonstrate a smarter, more developed approach.

What are the antonyms for Halfwit?

Famous quotes with Halfwit

  • It is a sore point, because you do have advantages if you have access to more than one language. You also have problems, because on bad days you don't trust yourself, either in your first or your second language, and so you feel like a complete halfwit.
    W. G. Sebald
  • We tend to think of [Hitler] as an idiot because the central tenet of his ideology was idiotic – and idiotic, of course, it transparently is. Anti-Semitism is a world view through a pinhole: as scientists say about a bad theory, it is not even wrong. Nietzsche tried to tell Wagner that it was beneath contempt. Sartre was right for once when he said that through anti-Semitism any halfwit could become a member of an elite. But, as the case of Wagner proves, a man can have this poisonous bee in his bonnet and still be a creative genius. Hitler was a destructive genius, whose evil gifts not only beggar description but invite denial, because we find it more comfortable to believe that their consequences were produced by historical forces than to believe that he was a historical force. Or perhaps we just lack the vocabulary. Not many of us, in a secular age, are willing to concede that, in the form of Hitler, Satan visited the Earth, recruited an army of sinners, and fought and won a battle against God. We would rather talk the language of pseudoscience, which at least seems to bring such events to order. But all such language can do is shift the focus of attention down to the broad mass of the German people, which is what Goldhagen has done, in a way that, at least in part, lets Hitler off the hook – and unintentionally reinforces his central belief that it was the destiny of the Jewish race to be expelled from the Volk as an inimical presence.
    Clive James

Word of the Day

hyperentangled
Hyperentangled is a word that is not very commonly used, and as such, there are not many synonyms for it. However, some of the ways that the meaning of hyperentangled can be expres...