What are the opposite words for mis-statements?

Mis-statements refer to statements that are inaccurate, false or misleading. Antonyms for the word mis-statements could include words like truth, accuracy, honesty and correctness. Truth is the opposite of mis-statements, meaning that a statement is factual and not false. Accuracy emphasizes the importance of being correct and precise, while honesty refers to expressing the truth without any intention of deception. Likewise, correctness refers to conforming to an established standard or precise rule, thus ensuring that a statement is true and accurate. By using antonyms for mis-statements, one can emphasize the importance of truthful and accurate communication, which is crucial for building trust and credibility with others.

What are the antonyms for Mis-statements?

• n.

  • distortion
  • beauty
  ,
  • clarity
  ,
  • perfection
  .
  • falsehood
  • frankness
  ,
  • honesty
  ,
  • non-fiction
  ,
  • openness
  ,
  • reality
  ,
  • truthfulness
  ,
  • uprightness
  .
  • lie
  • compliment
  ,
  • praise
  ,
  • sincerity
  .
  • misstatement
  • truth
  .
  • mistake
  • accuracy
  ,
  • calculation
  ,
  • certainty
  ,
  • correction
  ,
  • correctness
  ,
  • fact
  ,
  • proof
  ,
  • remembrance
  ,
  • respect
  ,
  • soundness
  ,
  • success
  ,
  • understanding
  .
  • pretense
  • honor
  ,
  • quiet
  ,
  • simplicity
  .

Famous quotes with Mis-statements

• Secondly, the student is trained to accept historical mis-statements on the authority of the book. If education is a pre- paration for adult life, he learns first to accept without question, and later to make his own contribution to the creation of historical fallacies, and still later to perpetuate what he has learnt. In this way, ignorant authors are leading innocent students to hysterical conclusions. The process of the writers' mind provides excellent material for a manual on logical fallacies. Thirdly, the student is told nothing about the relationship between evidence and truth. The truth is what the book ordains and the teacher repeats. No source is cited. No proof is offered. No argument is presented. The authors play a dangerous game of winks and nods and faints and gestures with evidence. The art is taught well through precept and example. The student grows into a young man eager to deal in assumptions but inapt in handling inquiries. Those who become historians produce narratives patterned on the textbooks on which they were brought up. Fourthly, the student is compelled to face a galling situation in his later years when he comes to realize that what he had learnt at school and college was not the truth. Imagine a graduate of one of our best colleges at the start of his studies in history in a university in Europe. Every lecture he attends and every book he reads drive him mad with exasperation, anger and frustration. He makes several grim discoveries. Most of the "facts", interpretations and theories on which he had been fostered in Pakistan now turn out to have been a fata morgana, an extravaganza of fantasies and reveries, myths and visions, whims and utopias, chimeras and fantasies.

  Khursheed Kamal Aziz

One antonym for the term "focus groups" is "individual interviews." While focus groups involve a group of people discussing a particular topic, individual interviews involve a one-...