What is another word for not touched?

Pronunciation: [nˌɒt tˈʌt͡ʃt] (IPA)

The phrase "not touched" can be substituted with several synonyms to convey a similar meaning. A few alternatives include "untouched," "unhandled," "unaffected," and "unscathed." "Untouched" indicates that something has not been physically touched or disturbed. "Unhandled" implies that something has not been tampered with or dealt with, while "unaffected" suggests that a situation has not been influenced or changed in any way. Finally, "unscathed" describes something that has not suffered any harm or damage. Each of these options conveys slightly different nuances, but they all suggest that something has not been touched in one way or another.

What are the hypernyms for Not touched?

A hypernym is a word with a broad meaning that encompasses more specific words called hyponyms.

What are the opposite words for not touched?

The antonyms for the word "not touched" could be "contacted", "reached," "grasped," "gripped," or "seized." These antonyms refer to situations where an object or a person has been physically touched or held. For example, if you say that a book has not been touched, the antonym could be that the book has been reached, indicating that someone has taken it off the shelf. Similarly, if you say that a person has not been touched, the antonym could be that the person has been contacted, which means that someone has made contact with them, either physically or emotionally. These antonyms highlight the idea of connection and interaction with the world around us.

What are the antonyms for Not touched?

Famous quotes with Not touched

  • Our enemies, like the Grecian hero, have one vulnerable point. You have not touched it yet. What should have been their element of weakness has been suffered to remain an element of strength.
    Jay Alan Sekulow
  • Aristotle feels this so strongly with reference to Plato's external, as contrasted with his own immanent, teleology that, forgetting his own concession elsewhere, he once roundly asserts that the final cause is 'not touched by the Ideas'. Again, what is the relation of the Idea of the Good to other ends (Ideas) or to the special functions of things? Efficient causes Plato attributes at one time to Idea, at another to soul: which is his real doctrine? and what is the relation of Idea to soul? Aristotle, therefore, while willing to admit that Plato made 'stammering' efforts in the direction of efficient and final causes, was perfectly justified in thinking that he had not 'fully worked them out'.
    Plato

Word of the Day

Focus Groups
One antonym for the term "focus groups" is "individual interviews." While focus groups involve a group of people discussing a particular topic, individual interviews involve a one-...