What are the opposite words for were without?

"Been with" is the antonym for the phrase "were without." When someone is "without" something, it means they are lacking or have a shortage of it. In contrast, "been with" refers to having something or someone present in one's life. The antonym emphasizes the presence or existence of the thing or person that was previously absent. For example, one could say "I was without a job for months, but I have been with this company for a year now." Ultimately, using the proper antonym for "were without" helps to more accurately convey the intended meaning and create clearer communication.

What are the antonyms for Were without?

• v.

  • lack
  • dislike
  ,
  • have
  .
  • need
  • abjure
  ,
  • despise
  ,
  • do not want
  ,
  • give
  ,
  • hate
  ,
  • not want
  .

Famous quotes with Were without

• They were without clothes before I got there, and they were without clothes when I left.

  Jock Sturges
• 'I have myself seen the depredations of the Afghans round Dehli and Mattra. God defend us from them! It makes the very hair of the body stand on end to think of them. Two hundred thousand men were destroyed in these massacres, and the hordes of the enemy were without number. Such atrocities, forsooth, were perpetrated in compliance with their religion and law! What cared they for the religion, the law, the honour and reputation of the innocent sufferers? It was enough for such bigots that splendour accrued by their deeds to the faith of Muhammad and 'Ali!'

  Ahmed Shah Durrani
• What they were most determined for me to swallow was my fellow creatures. In this they were without mercy.Some of this rubbish has come in handy on occasions, I don’t deny it, on occasions which would never have arisen if they had left me in peace. I use it still, to scratch my arse with.

  Samuel Beckett
• Eliza and I composed a precocious critique of the Constitution of the United States of America … We argued that is was as good a scheme for misery as any, since its success in keeping the common people reasonably happy and proud depended on the strength of the people themselves — and yet it prescribed no practical machinery which would tend to make the people, as opposed to their elected representatives, strong. We said it was possible that the framers of the Constitution were blind to the beauty of persons who were without great wealth or powerful friends or public office, but who were nonetheless genuinely strong. We thought it was more likely, though, that their framers had not noticed that it was natural, and therefore almost inevitable, that human beings in extraordinary and enduring situations should think of themselves of composing new families. Eliza and I pointed out that this happened no less in democracies than in tyrannies, since human beings were the same the wide world over, and civilized only yesterday. Elected representatives, hence, could be expected to become members of the famous and powerful family of elected representatives — which would, perfectly naturally, make them wary and squeamish and stingy with respect to all the other sorts of families which, again, perfectly naturally, subdivided mankind. Eliza and I … proposed that the Constitution be amended so as to guarantee that every citizen, no matter how humble, or crazy or incompetent or deformed, somehow be given membership in some family as covertly xenophobic and crafty as the one their public servants formed.

  Kurt Vonnegut

When it comes to synonyms for the word "dicty-", several options can be considered. One such synonym is "pretentious," which refers to someone who acts in a haughty manner, attempt...