What is another word for nationalised?

Pronunciation: [nˈaʃənəlˌa͡ɪzd] (IPA)

Nationalised is a word that means to bring a private enterprise under government control. Some synonyms for nationalised include state-controlled, public, government-run, and nationalized. Other expressions that can be used instead of nationalised are nationalized enterprise, public-sector operation, state-run company, and state-owned organization. Furthermore, the phrase government-operated, which connotes that the enterprise is wholly owned and managed by the government, can be a suitable alternative for nationalised. Other words that are related to nationalised are socialism, communism, and collectivism. These synonyms define the concept of nationalisation and can be used interchangeably depending on the context.

What are the hypernyms for Nationalised?

A hypernym is a word with a broad meaning that encompasses more specific words called hyponyms.

Famous quotes with Nationalised

  • The US — its bankrupt mortgage institutions nationalised and its gigantic war machine effectively funded by foreign borrowing — is in steep decline. With its financial system in the worst mess since the 1930s, the west's ability to shape events is dwindling by the day. Sermonising about "law-based international relations" is laughable after Iraq, and at bottom not much more than nostalgia for a vanished hegemony.
    John Gray (philosopher)
  • 'Terrorism' is a word that has become a plague on our vocabulary,the excuse and reason and moral permit for state-sponsored violence - our violence - which is now used on the innocent of the Middle East ever more outrageously and promiscuously. Terrorism, terrorism, terrorism. It has become a full stop, a punctuation mark, a phrase, a speech, a sermon, the be-all and end-all of everything that we must hate in order to ignore injustice and occupation and murder on a mass scale. Terror, terror, terror, terror. It is a sonata, a symphony, an orchestra tuned to every television and radio station and news agency report, the soap-opera of the Devil, served up on prime-time or distilled in wearyingly dull and mendacious form by the right-wing 'commentators' of the America east coast or the Jerusalem Post or the intellectuals of Europe. Strike against Terror. Victory over Terror. War on Terror. Everlasting War on Terror. Rarely in history have soldiers and journalists and presidents and kings aligned themselves in such thoughtless, unquestioning ranks. In August 1914, the soldiers thought they would be home by Christmas. Today, we are fighting for ever. The war is eternal. The enemy is eternal, his face changing on our screens. Once he lived in Cairo and sported a moustache and nationalised the Suez Canal. Then he lived in Tripoli and wore a ridiculous military uniform and helped the IRA and bombed American bars in Berlin. Then he wore a Muslim Imam's gown and ate yoghurt in Tehran and planned Islamic revolution. Then he wore a white gown and lived in a cave in Afghanistan and then he wore another silly moustache and resided in a series of palaces around Baghdad. Terror, terror, terror. Finally, he wore a kuffiah headdress and outdated Soviet-style military fatigues, his name was Yassir Arafat, and he was the master of world terror and then a super-statesman and then again, a master of terror, linked by Israeli enemies to the terror- of them all, the one who lived in the Afghan cave.
    Robert Fisk
  • More than a decade after the Shah's death it is no longer necessary to be for or against him on all matters. How could one be for or against everything that happened during a reign of nearly thirty-eight years? How could Iranians not be for him when he fought over Azerbaijan or when he gave the royal assent to the bill that nationalised Iran's oil? How could one be against the principle of land reform or the enhancement of women's status? And did he not deserve support when he fought for a more just system of production and pricing for oil, which he called 'a noble substance'? But how could anyone be for him when he closed all doors on discussion and debate and effectively drove many intelligent and patriotic Iranians into the arms of reactionary mullahs? And how could one approve of the unchecked intervention of the SAVAK secret police in virtually all aspects of life, especially in the 1970s? Last but not least, it would be difficult to understand, much less to justify, his almost pathological belief that only the major powers were capable of either protecting or destabilising his regime.
    Amir Taheri

Related words: nationalised healthcare in the us, nationalised healthcare system, nationalised health care system, nationalized health care, nationalized healthcare australia, nationalized health care in canada, what is nationalized healthcare, nationalized healthcare in britain, nationalized health care in france

Related questions:

  • How does a nationalised?
  • Word of the Day

    mu Chain Disease
    There are no precise antonyms for the medical term "mu chain disease." Mu chain disease is a rare form of lymphoma characterized by the proliferation of immature B-lymphocytes whic...