What is another word for tearing down?

Pronunciation: [tˈe͡əɹɪŋ dˈa͡ʊn] (IPA)

When we talk about tearing down, we are usually referring to the act of demolishing or destroying something completely. However, there are several synonyms for this phrase that can be used to add variety to our language and make our writing more dynamic. Some examples include taking apart, dismantling, demolishing, decimating, pulverizing, obliterating, eradicating, and annihilating. Each of these terms emphasizes a different aspect of destruction, from disassembling to obliterating completely. By incorporating synonyms like these into our writing, we can avoid repeating the same phrase and create a more engaging and nuanced text.

What are the hypernyms for Tearing down?

A hypernym is a word with a broad meaning that encompasses more specific words called hyponyms.

What are the opposite words for tearing down?

The term "tearing down" denotes the act of dismantling or destroying something. The antonyms for such an expression might involve "constructing," "building up," "erecting," and "establishing." When we say that we're "tearing down" an old building, those who wish to preserve it may suggest "preserving," "maintaining," or "conserving" it. Similarly, other antonyms of "tearing down" might include terms like "uplifting," "enhancing," and "improving." These words suggest that instead of tearing something apart, we're adding value to it or making it better in some way. Conversely, the opposite of tearing down might involve "desisting," "abandoning," or "renouncing" instead of actively engaging in any activity.

What are the antonyms for Tearing down?

Famous quotes with Tearing down

  • Lazy people tend not to take chances, but express themselves by tearing down other's work.
    Ann Rule
  • Everyone should play their role in tearing down the wall of hatred.
    Lalu Prasad Yadav
  • Tom Strong and the rest of the ABC bunch leave me cold for a lot of reasons. First—and I realize this is purely subjective, but what isn’t?—I find a smugness, a condescension that reads to me as nostalgia being done by someone who is not in the least bit nostalgic. Almost as if Moore sits down to write and flips his brain 180°, so he’s not really writing what he feels or what he likes, just the exact opposite of what he would usually write.Also, there is the whole pastiche/homage/whatever thing. I find this really annoying. Not just when Moore does it. I can look back on elements of my own work and be annoyed at myself for going down that path. I only did it on rare occasions, tho. Moore has turned it into a career. So much so, that in the post- era I have trouble calling to mind much that he has done that was not based on someone else’s previous work. I am not the most original guy on the block, but at least when I do Superman, I do Superman.I suppose a lot of this could simply be the bad taste his earlier work left for me. All that tearing down and “deconstructionism.” All that revealing of the flaws and feet of clay, not a bit of which has served the industry in any positive way, and, in fact, has left huge scars across it, like the ones left in the landscape by open pit mining.
    John Byrne
  • Giant and great as this Dean is, I say we should hoot him. Some of this audience mayn't have read the last part of Gulliver, and to such I would recall the advice of the venerable Mr. Punch to persons about to marry, and say, 'Don't'. When Gulliver first lands among the Yahoos, the naked howling wretches clamber up trees and assault him, and he describes himself as 'almost stifled with the filth which fell about him.' The reader of the fourth part of is like the hero himself in this instance. It is Yahoo language: a monster gibbering shrieks, and gnashing imprecations against mankind — tearing down all shreds of modesty, past all sense of manliness and shame; filthy in word, filthy in thought, furious, raging, obscene.
    Jonathan Swift
  • There were always people searching for the Unmaker, for some awful destructive power outside themselves. Poor fools, they always thought that Destruction was merely destruction, they were using it and when they were done with it, they’d set to building. But you don’t build on a foundation of destruction. That’s the dark secret of the Unmaker, Alvin thought. Once he sets you to tearing down, it’s hard to get back to building, hard to get your own self back. The digger wears out the ground the spade. And once you let yourself be a tool in the Unmaker’s hand, he’ll wear you out, he’ll tear you down, he’ll dull you and hole you and all the time you’ll be thining you’re so sharp and fine and bright and whole, and you never go till he lets go of you, lets you drop and fall. What’s that clatter? Why, that was me. That was me, sounding like a wore-out tool. What you leaving me for? I still got use left in me? But you don’t, not when the Unmaker’s got you.
    Orson Scott Card

Related words: tear down a wall, tearing down a wall cost, how to tear down a wall, can you tear down a wall, how to tear down a wall yourself, how to tear down a wall with a hammer

Related questions:

  • Can you take down a wall?
  • Can you tear down a wall yourself?
  • Do you need a permit to take?
  • Word of the Day

    cyclic insanity
    Antonyms are words that have an opposite meaning to the word being described. In the case of "cyclic insanity," the opposite could be "mental stability," "balance of mind," or "san...