What is another word for well-off?

181 synonyms found


[ wˈɛlˈɒf], [ wˈɛlˈɒf], [ w_ˈɛ_l_ˈɒ_f]

There are various synonyms for the word "well-off," which refers to a person, family, or group of people who are financially stable or affluent. Some common synonyms for this term include wealthy, prosperous, rich, affluent, and well-to-do. Other synonyms that could be used to describe someone who is well-off include financially secure, comfortable, thriving, loaded, and prosperous. These adjectives all convey the same general meaning, but they differ slightly in their connotations and degrees of wealth. Ultimately, the choice of synonym will depend on the context and the desired emphasis, but all these synonyms effectively express the notion of financial stability and prosperity.

Synonyms for Well-off:

What are the paraphrases for Well-off?

Paraphrases are restatements of text or speech using different words and phrasing to convey the same meaning.
Paraphrases are highlighted according to their relevancy:
- highest relevancy
- medium relevancy
- lowest relevancy

What are the hypernyms for Well-off?

A hypernym is a word with a broad meaning that encompasses more specific words called hyponyms.

What are the opposite words for well-off?

Well-off is a word used to describe someone who is financially stable and has a comfortable standard of living. Its antonyms are words that indicate the polar opposite of such a situation. For instance, someone who is not well-off may be described as poor, impoverished, or destitute. These individuals often lack financial resources and face challenges in meeting basic human needs such as food, shelter, and clothing. Other antonyms for well-off include broke, penurious, impecunious, and insolvent. These words describe individuals who are struggling financially and lack the ability to access necessary resources, leading to a difficult and often stressful life.

Famous quotes with Well-off

  • So, I am independently well-off and don't have to do anything, but I still do. I write books, lecture around the world, work with scientists and governments.
    Uri Geller
  • What agents would choose in certain well- defined conditions of ignorance (in the “original position”) is, for Rawls, an important criterion for determining which conception of “justice” is normatively acceptable. Why should we agree that choice under conditions of ignorance is a good criterion for deciding what kind of society we would wish to have? William Morris in the late nineteenth century claimed to prefer a society of more or less equal grinding poverty for all (e.g., the society he directly experienced in Iceland) to Britain with its extreme discrepancies of wealth and welfare, even though the least well-off in Britain were in absolute terms better off than the peasants and fishermen of Iceland.” This choice seems to have been based not on any absolute preference for equality (or on a commitment to any conception of fairness), but on a belief about the specific social (and other) evils that flowed from the ways in which extreme wealth could be used in an industrial capitalist society.” Would no one in the original position entertain views like these? Is Morris’s vote simply to be discounted? On what grounds? The “veil of ignorance” is artificially defined so as to allow certain bits of knowledge “in” and to exclude other bits. No doubt it would be possible to rig the veil of ignorance so that it blanks out knowledge of the particular experiences Morris had and the theories he developed, and renders them inaccessible in the original position, but one would then have to be convinced that this was not simply a case of modifying the conditions of the thought experiment and the procedure until one got the result one antecedently wanted.
    Raymond Geuss
  • The American Society of Civil Engineers said in 2007 that the U.S. had fallen so far behind in maintaining its public infrastructure -- roads, bridges, schools, dams -- that it would take more than a trillion and half dollars over five years to bring it back up to standard. Instead, these types of expenditures are being cut back. At the same time, public infrastructure around the world is facing unprecedented stress, with hurricanes, cyclones, floods and forest fires all increasing in frequency and intensity. It's easy to imagine a future in which growing numbers of cities have their frail and long-neglected infrastructures knocked out by disasters and then are left to rot, their core services never repaired or rehabilitated. The well-off, meanwhile, will withdraw into gated communities, their needs met by privatized providers.
    Naomi Klein

Word of the Day

united action