What is another word for oligarchs?

Pronunciation: [ˈɒlɪɡˌɑːkz] (IPA)

The word oligarch usually refers to a small group of people who hold immense political or economic power. However, there are other words used to describe these individuals that can be useful in varying contexts. Some synonyms for oligarchs might include magnates, aristocrats, tycoons, plutocrats, or even elites. Each of these terms conveys a slightly different connotation, with magnates and tycoons emphasizing massive wealth, and aristocrats implying a more hereditary privilege. Plutocrats suggest a link between wealth and political power, while elites can refer to any group at the top of a hierarchy, not just the ultra-rich. All of these words can be useful in discussing concentrations of power and privilege in society.

What are the paraphrases for Oligarchs?

Paraphrases are restatements of text or speech using different words and phrasing to convey the same meaning.
Paraphrases are highlighted according to their relevancy:
- highest relevancy
- medium relevancy
- lowest relevancy

What are the hypernyms for Oligarchs?

A hypernym is a word with a broad meaning that encompasses more specific words called hyponyms.

What are the opposite words for oligarchs?

The word "oligarchs" refers to a small group of wealthy and powerful individuals who control the government or business in a particular country or region. Antonyms for this word include democracy, equality, and commonwealth. These words represent forms of government or society where power is distributed among the people, rather than concentrated in the hands of a few individuals. Democracy refers to a system in which citizens participate in decision-making through free and fair elections. Equality implies that everyone has the same rights and opportunities, regardless of their economic or social status. Commonwealth suggests a society where the resources and benefits are shared equally among all members.

What are the antonyms for Oligarchs?

Usage examples for Oligarchs

He wrote fifty-four plays, of which only eleven remain, and was crowned in a public assembly for his attacks on the oligarchs.
"A Biographical Dictionary of Freethinkers of All Ages and Nations"
Joseph Mazzini Wheeler
At last they put off the Gymnopaediae and marched to their succour, but learning at Tegea the defeat of the oligarchs, refused to go any further in spite of the entreaties of those who had escaped, and returned home and kept the festival.
"The History of the Peloponnesian War"
Should the enterprise succeed, and Delium be fortified, its authors confidently expected that even if no revolution should immediately follow in Boeotia, yet with these places in their hands, and the country being harassed by incursions, and a refuge in each instance near for the partisans engaged in them, things would not remain as they were, but that the rebels being supported by the Athenians and the forces of the oligarchs divided, it would be possible after a while to settle matters according to their wishes.
"The History of the Peloponnesian War"

Famous quotes with Oligarchs

  • Of greater importance than this regulation of African clientship were the political consequences of the Jugurthine war or rather of the Jugurthine insurrection, although these have been frequently estimated too highly. Certainly all the evils of the government were therein brought to light in all their nakedness; it was now not merely notorious but, so to speak, judicially established, that among the governing lords of Rome everything was treated as venal--the treaty of peace and the right of intercession, the rampart of the camp and the life of the soldier; the African had said no more than the simple truth, when on his departure from Rome he declared that, if he had only gold enough, he would undertake to buy the city itself. But the whole external and internal government of this period bore the same stamp of miserable baseness. In our case the accidental fact, that the war in Africa is brought nearer to us by means of better accounts than the other contemporary military and political events, shifts the true perspective; contemporaries learned by these revelations nothing but what everybody knew long before and every intrepid patriot had long been in a position to support by facts. The circumstance, however, that they were now furnished with some fresh, still stronger and still more irrefutable, proofs of the baseness of the restored senatorial government--a baseness only surpassed by its incapacity--might have been of importance, had there been an opposition and a public opinion with which the government would have found it necessary to come to terms. But this war had in fact exposed the corruption of the government no less than it had revealed the utter nullity of the opposition. It was not possible to govern worse than the restoration governed in the years 637-645; it was not possible to stand forth more defenceless and forlorn than was the Roman senate in 645: had there been in Rome a real opposition, that is to say, a party which wished and urged a fundamental alteration of the constitution, it must necessarily have now made at least an attempt to overturn the restored senate. No such attempt took place; the political question was converted into a personal one, the generals were changed, and one or two useless and unimportant people were banished. It was thus settled, that the so-called popular party as such neither could nor would govern; that only two forms of government were at all possible in Rome, a -tyrannis- or an oligarchy; that, so long as there happened to be nobody sufficiently well known, if not sufficiently important, to usurp the regency of the state, the worst mismanagement endangered at the most individual oligarchs, but never the oligarchy; that on the other hand, so soon as such a pretender appeared, nothing was easier than to shake the rotten curule chairs. In this respect the coming forward of Marius was significant, just because it was in itself so utterly unwarranted. If the burgesses had stormed the senate-house after the defeat of Albinus, it would have been a natural, not to say a proper course; but after the turn which Metellus had given to the Numidian war, nothing more could be said of mismanagement, and still less of danger to the commonwealth, at least in this respect; and yet the first ambitious officer who turned up succeeded in doing that with which the older Africanus had once threatened the government,(16) and procured for himself one of the principal military commands against the distinctly- expressed will of the governing body. Public opinion, unavailing in the hands of the so-called popular party, became an irresistible weapon in the hands of the future king of Rome. We do not mean to say
    Theodor Mommsen

Related words: rothschild family, russian oligarchs, oligarch lifestyle, how to become an oligarch, oligarchs of wall street

Related questions:

  • Who are the richest oligarchs in the world?
  • How does someone become an oligarch?
  • What do the rothschilds do?
  • Why are there so many oligarchs in russia?
  • Word of the Day

    Cortical Blindness
    Cortical blindness is a term used to describe the loss of vision resulting from damage to the visual cortex of the brain. In contrast, the antonyms for cortical blindness refer to ...