What is another word for cites?

Pronunciation: [sˈa͡ɪts] (IPA)

The word "cites" refers to the act of mentioning or quoting a source. There are several synonyms for "cites" that can be used in different contexts to convey the same meaning. These include "references," "quotes," "alludes to," "mentions," "reports," and "states." By using different synonyms for "cites," writers can vary their language and avoid repetition, making their work more interesting to read. So whether you are writing an academic paper or a casual article, using synonyms for "cites" can make your writing more dynamic and engaging to your readers.

Synonyms for Cites:

What are the paraphrases for Cites?

Paraphrases are restatements of text or speech using different words and phrasing to convey the same meaning.
Paraphrases are highlighted according to their relevancy:
- highest relevancy
- medium relevancy
- lowest relevancy

What are the hypernyms for Cites?

A hypernym is a word with a broad meaning that encompasses more specific words called hyponyms.

Usage examples for Cites

He cites Menzel as the highest example of such performance.
"George Du Maurier, the Satirist of the Victorians"
T. Martin Wood
The passage he cites, however, is no more rhythmical than many passages in modern English prose.
"The Literature of Ecstasy"
Albert Mordell
Neither Hartmann's exposition nor the authorities he cites have the force of moral conviction for the claim for purely mechanical descent.
"The Old Riddle and the Newest Answer"
John Gerard

Famous quotes with Cites

  • Falibilidad se define simplemente como estado de ser capaces de cometer errores o estar mal a veces. permíteme decirte esto, cada ser humano es falible naturalmente. ¡sí! has oído bien, como de costumbre, cada ser humano está sujeto a errores o errores, incluso el mismo Papa es falible naturalmente. aunque, que es ampliamente considerado como infalible de acuerdo con el dogma de la Iglesia Católica Romana. pero vamos, es el Papa (a) católica? sin embargo, es la ilusión a considerar a nadie como infalible. Quiero decir, todo el que se refiere a cualquier humano como incapaces de cometer errores o estar equivocado no es más que engañosa. además, sea quien dice ser infalible nunca ha probado algo nuevo antes y es sólo un cobarde que es a menudo reacios a probar algo nuevo, sólo por miedo al fracaso o errores. vamos, es el Papa (a) católica? además, en caso de que no lo sé, Dios Todopoderoso es el único que está siempre infalible. aparte de él (Dios Todopoderoso) ninguna otra persona es infalible natural, independientemente de profesores de renombre mundial. de todos modos, no me cites derecha o bien se puede decir lo digo yo QED.
    Emeasoba George
  • The giraffe's neck supposedly supplies a crucial example for preferring natural selection over Lamarckism as a cause of evolution. But Darwin himself (however wrongly by later judgement) did not deny the Lamarckian principle of inheritance for characters acquired by use or lost by disuse. He regarded the Lamarckian mechanism as weak, infrequent, and entirely subsidiary to natural selection, but he accepted the validity of evolution by use and disuse. Darwin does speculate about the adaptive advantage of giraffe's necks, but he cites natural selection and Lamarckism as probable causes of elongation.
    Stephen Jay Gould
  • Now there’s document on a subject of states' rights and states' sovereignty which is very seldom cited but which is absolutely fundamental to understanding the status of sovereignty under the Constitution: the letter that George Washington wrote transmitting the new Constitution to the Congress on September 17, 1787. And among the ironies of this letter is the fact that John C. Calhoun in his Discourse on the Constitution and Government of the United States, the sequel to his Disquisition on Government, cites the words that Washington used to support his position that this was a federal government, and that “federal” meant one in which the constituent parts retains complete sovereignty. And he refers to the fact that Washington refers to “the federal government of these States.”
    Harry V. Jaffa
  • The ... is deficient, sometimes pardonably, sometimes without excuse, in generalization. The book of , to which Diophantus sometimes refers, seems on the other hand to have been entirely devoted to the discussion of general properties of numbers. It is three times expressly quoted in the ... Of all these propositions he says... 'we find it in the Porisms'; but he cites also a great many similar propositions without expressly referring to the . These latter citations fall into two classes, the first of which contains mere , such as the algebraical equivalents of the theorems in Euclid II. ...The other class contains general propositions concerning the resolution of numbers into the sum of two, three or four squares. ...It will be seen that all these propositions are of the general form which ought to have been but is not adopted in the . We are therefore led to the conclusion that the Porismata, like the pamphlet on Polygonal Numbers, was a synthetic and not an analytic treatise. It is open, however, to anyone to maintain the contrary, since no proof of any is now extant.
    James Gow (scholar)
  • Anybody who has looked up the reference material that Innis cites so frequently will be struck by the skill with which he has extracted exciting facts from dull expositions. He explored his source materials with a "Geiger counter," as it were. In turn, he presents his finds in a pattern of insights that are not packaged for the consumer palate. He expects the reader to make discovery after discovery that he himself had missed.
    Harold Innis

Word of the Day

Parrots diseases sign
Parrots diseases sign is a term used to describe symptoms that indicate illness in pet parrots. However, there are many antonyms for this word that can be used to describe the oppo...