What is another word for holding in?

Pronunciation: [hˈə͡ʊldɪŋ ˈɪn] (IPA)

Holding in describes the act of restraining oneself from expressing emotions or feelings. There are numerous synonyms for holding in that one can use to articulate this feeling, some of which include suppressing, bottling up, repressing, curbing, containing, controlling, restraining, and stifling. Each of these words describes the feeling of not letting one's emotions out for fear of being judged, causing a scene, or inciting conflict. Holding in can be a positive or negative experience, depending on the situation. On one hand, it can lead to peace and harmony, while on the other hand, it can lead to feelings of resentment, frustration, and emotional breakdown if not managed appropriately.

Synonyms for Holding in:

What are the hypernyms for Holding in?

A hypernym is a word with a broad meaning that encompasses more specific words called hyponyms.

What are the opposite words for holding in?

The phrase "holding in" can have several meanings, such as restraining emotions, keeping a secret, or withholding a physical function. Antonyms for these meanings can include expressing emotions freely, divulging information, and releasing bodily functions. The opposite of holding in emotions could be expressing emotions openly and honestly. Telling a secret would be the antonym of holding in a secret. Finally, letting go or releasing would be the antonym for holding in or withholding a physical function, such as laughter or urine. In each case, the antonym for holding in is about freeing oneself from internal constraints and allowing oneself to act or express oneself more freely.

Famous quotes with Holding in

  • Flames from the lips may be produced by holding in the mouth a sponge saturated with the purest gasoline.
    Harry Houdini
  • A person who acquires a holding in accordance with the principle of justice in acquisition is entitled to that holding.No one is entitled to a holding except by (repeated) applications of 1 and 2.
    Robert Nozick
  • The classifications of 'early' and 'middle-period' dialogues rest squarely on the interpretative theses concerning the progress of Plato's work, philosophically and literarily, outlined above. As such, they are an unsuitable basis for bringing anyone to the reading of these works. To use them in that way is to announce in advance the results of a certain interpretation of the dialogues and to canonize that interpretation under the guise of a presumably objective order of composition—when in fact no such order is objectively known. And it thereby risks prejudicing an unwary reader against the fresh, individual reading that these works demand. For these reasons, I urge readers not to undertake the study of Plato’s works holding in mind the customary chronological groupings of 'early', 'middle', and 'late' dialogues. It is safe to recognize only the group of six late dialogues. Even for these, it is better to relegate thoughts about chronology to the secondary position they deserve and to concentrate on the literary and philosophical content of the works, taken on their own and in relation to the others.

Word of the Day

The phrase "MOUT FACT" is a unique and scarcely used term in everyday language. However, when exploring its synonyms, we can discover its equivalent expressions. "MOUT FACT" can be...