What is another word for admixture?

Pronunciation: [ɐdmˈɪkst͡ʃə] (IPA)

The word "admixture" refers to a mixture of two or more substances or elements. Synonyms for admixture include blend, combination, mixture, amalgamation, concoction, fusion, medley, amalgam, and alloy. A blend refers to a combination of two or more things that are different but work well together. A combination refers to two or more things being placed together to form one entity. A concoction refers to a mixture of ingredients, especially one that is unusual or not obvious. Fusion refers to the combination of two or more things into a single entity. Medley refers to a mixture of different things that are often combined in an unlikely way. An alloy is a mixture of two or more metals, while an amalgamation is a mixture of different things, typically metals or substances.

Synonyms for Admixture:

What are the paraphrases for Admixture?

Paraphrases are restatements of text or speech using different words and phrasing to convey the same meaning.
Paraphrases are highlighted according to their relevancy:
- highest relevancy
- medium relevancy
- lowest relevancy

What are the hypernyms for Admixture?

A hypernym is a word with a broad meaning that encompasses more specific words called hyponyms.

What are the hyponyms for Admixture?

Hyponyms are more specific words categorized under a broader term, known as a hypernym.

What are the opposite words for admixture?

Antonyms are words that have opposite meanings to a particular word. Admixture's antonyms are terms that represent pure, unmixed, or separated items. Some of the common antonyms for admixture are purity, unadulteration, clarity, clarity, clarity, homogeneity, and separation. Purity means being free from any foreign elements or substances, while unadulteration connotes something that is not spoiled, diluted or mixed with anything else. Clarity means being transparent and clear, homogeneity refers to the uniformity of a substance, while separation suggests the division of components into different parts. These antonyms can provide a clear understanding of the opposite of admixture and can be helpful in communication or writing.

What are the antonyms for Admixture?

Usage examples for Admixture

The quantity of chloroform required to produce insensibility to external impressions varies much in different cases and must be regulated, as well as the admixture of air, by a competent assistant.
"Special Report on Diseases of Cattle"
U.S. Department of Agriculture J.R. Mohler
It has been shown, however, that when this is eaten without some admixture of other food, cattle frequently sicken and die.
"Special Report on Diseases of Cattle"
U.S. Department of Agriculture J.R. Mohler
As a matter of fact, there are very few Socialists who advocate State Socialism without any admixture of Syndicalism.
"The Book of Life: Vol. I Mind and Body; Vol. II Love and Society"
Upton Sinclair

Famous quotes with Admixture

  • From the throes of inspiration and the eddies of thought the poet may at last be able to arrive at, and convey the right admixture of words and meaning.
    Eyvind Johnson
  • Superstition is the religion of feeble minds; and they must be tolerated in an admixture of it in some trifling or enthusiastic shape or other; else you will deprive weak minds of a resource found necessary to the strongest.
    Burke
  • I am not suggesting that racial admixture is a solution to the world’s grave problems. I am suggesting, however, that a freedom of diverse parts in Nature to blend into variant universals should be open in fiction and art.
    Wilson Harris
  • Those who advocate common usage in philosophy sometimes speak in a manner that suggests the mystique of the 'common man.' They may admit that in organic chemistry there is need of long words, and that quantum physics requires formulas that are difficult to translate into ordinary English, but philosophy (they think) is different. It is not the function of philosophy – so they maintain – to teach something that uneducated people do not know; on the contrary, its function is to teach superior persons that they are not as superior as they thought they were, and that those who are really superior can show their skill by making sense of common sense. No one wants to alter the language of common sense, any more than we wish to give up talking of the sun rising and setting. But astronomers find a different language better, and I contend that a different language is better in philosophy. Let us take an example, that of perception. There is here an admixture of philosophical and scientific questions, but this admixture is inevitable in many questions, or, if not inevitable, can only be avoided by confining ourselves to comparatively unimportant aspects of the matter in hand. Here is a series of questions and answers. . When I see a table, will what I see be still there if I shut my eyes? . That depends upon the sense in which you use the word 'see.' . What is still there when I shut my eyes? . This is an empirical question. Don't bother me with it, but ask the physicists. . What exists when my eyes are open, but not when they are shut? . This again is empirical, but in deference to previous philosophers I will answer you: colored surfaces. . May I infer that there are two senses of 'see'? In the first, when I 'see' a table, I 'see' something conjectural about which physics has vague notions that are probably wrong. In the second, I 'see' colored surfaces which cease to exist when I shut my eyes. . That is correct if you want to think clearly, but our philosophy makes clear thinking unnecessary. By oscillating between the two meanings, we avoid paradox and shock, which is more than most philosophers do.
    Bertrand Russell
  • Of the complete biological inferiority of the negro there can be no question—he has anatomical features consistently varying from those of other stocks, & always in the direction of the lower primates . . . Equally inferior—& perhaps even more so—is the Australian black stock, which differs widely from the real negro . . . In dealing with these two black races, there is only one sound attitude for any other race (be it white, Indian, Malay, Polynesian, or Mongolian) to take—& that is to prevent admixture as completely & determinedly as it can be prevented, through the establishment of a colour-line & the rigid forcing of all mixed offspring below that line. I am in accord with the most vehement & vociferous Alabaman or Mississippian on that point … racial questions are wholly different in nature—involving wide variations unconnected with superiority or inferiority. Only an ignorant dolt would attempt to call a Chinese gentleman—heir to one of the greatest artistic & philosophic traditions in the world—an "inferior" of any sort . . . & yet there are potent reasons, based on wide physical, mental, & cultural differences, why great numbers of the Chinese ought not to mix into the Caucasian fabric, or vice versa. It is not that one race is any than any other, but that their whole respective heritages are so antipodal as to make harmonious adjustment impossible. Members of one race can fit into another only through the of their own background-influences—& even then the adjustment will always remain uneasy & imperfect if the newcomer's physical aspect froms a constant reminder of his outside origin. Therefore it is wise to discourage all mixtures of sharply differentiated races—though the color-line does not need to be drawn as strictly as in the case of the negro, since we know that a dash or two of Mongolian or Indian or Hindoo or some such blood will not actually injure a white stock biologically. . . . As a matter of fact, most of the psychological race-differences which strike us so prominently are rather than . If one could take a Japanese infant, alter his features to the Anglo-Saxon type through plastic surgery, & place him with an American family in Boston for rearing—without telling him that he is not an American—the chances are that in 20 years the result would be a typical American youth with very few instincts to distinguish him from his pure Nordic college-mates. The same is true of other superior alien races including the Jew—although the Nazis persist in acting on a false biological conception. If they were wise in their campaign to get rid of Jewish cultural influences (& a great deal can be said for such a campaign, when the dominance of the Aryan tradition is threatened as in Germany & New York City), they would not emphasize the separatism of the Jew but would strive to make him give up his separate culture & lose himself in the German people. It wouldn't hurt Germany—or alter its essential physical type—to take in all the Jews it now has. (However, that wouldn't work in Poland or New York City, where the Jews are of an inferior strain, & so numerous that they would essentially modify the physical type.)
    H. P. Lovecraft

Word of the Day

Ponds Extract
Ponds Extract, a well-known skincare product, has garnered immense popularity over the years for its nourishing benefits. However, for those seeking alternatives or different varia...